Science
must be objective, impersonal, not subjective (through polls, for example), in
order to find the true scientific ways for the benefit of the humankind. Since we
all live on a same planet, these correct ways are important and decisive for
all. Therefore, I recommend you to read the papers "Climate Changes: How
the Atmosphere Really Works" and “The Physical Principles Elucidate
Numerous Atmospheric Behaviors", which ones change the world and demonstrate
the true physical principles of the atmospheric behaviors that were also
confirmed by experimental data and calculations. Everything there is consistent,
coherent and transparent. A true science can be written even onto a napkin, and
these articles were submitted to strong peer-review as well as the author is
firmly aware on the correctness of the physical principles that he writes about.
There you will see,
among many other things:
- the planet works
according to two systems of the solar energy area: a solar still and a solar
evaporator, and not according to a CO2 layer circling the planet or to a
common greenhouse without water;
- the radiation is not
the only heat transfer mode for determining the air temperature and is much
smaller than the evaporation one, and then among many other conclusions this is
why the "hockey stick" is a fraud;
- the current science on
global warming or climate changes caused by the CO2 says that when the
atmosphere warms the evaporation increases, but it is demonstrated physically
and mathematically that this is wrong. For example, if temperature or warming
created water, the Sahara would be the most humid place on the planet;
- the true explanation and
solution for the “evaporation paradox”. The corresponding empirical “solutions”
found for such incomprehension violate the fundamental laws of the nature or of
the physics, such as the law of conservation of energy and mass;
- cloud covers reduce
the wind and the evaporation and can increase the warming below them. The CO2
does not have this physical property;
- through true graphs
and calculations, the theoretical influence of the CO2 on the air temperature
is shown to be less than one percent, thus, an insignificant influence. Ingenuous
arguments such as the rudimentary and incipient ones of the 19th
Century used by NASA, for example, to justify the power of the CO2, merely inform that
this gas has a greenhouse effect, but does not define about how much is its
power. Furthermore, the CO2 has no one physical property to
cause any climate changes;
- the CO2 is not decisive for
building and changing the temperatures of Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter and
Earth;
- the Sun is not the
only heat source for the atmosphere;
- the geoengineering is
an absolute insanity and demonstrates the deep lack of knowledge on the true
atmospheric behaviors;
- ice cores are invalid
for "determining" "past" temperatures or climates of the
planet;
- how an igloo works;
- that's
incredible, humans can influence the climate, but not as has been said to us up
to now;
- the New Hydrological
Cycle, discovered by Sartori;
- which is the most
accurate equation for the evaporation rate;
- much, much
more.
And further info
at
