THE
SUN IS NOT THE ONLY HEAT SOURCE FOR THE ATMOSPHERE
In the scientific developments that I have done
I have always had a vast material to demonstrate that the pseudoscience of
the “global warming caused by the CO2” does not know
deeply neither basically the true physical concepts nor the working principles
of the atmosphere. Even so, such wrong empirical “science” commands the world
due to its strong political and mediatic influence, which, however, is not
based on science, because this one is not sustained by them. For example, the
solar/thermal radiation and its CO2 are not the only components or the responsible
ones for the determination of the air temperature. This is demonstrated
physically and mathematically in my articles “The Physical Principles Elucidate
Numerous Atmospheric Behaviors and Human-Induced Climatic Consequences” (2012)
and “Climate Changes: How the Atmosphere Really Works” (2015).
Also demonstrated in these papers is the fact
that such pseudoscience and the rest of the world did not imagine that the Sun
is not the only heat source for the atmosphere. In reality, there are many
others that also affect the air temperature and other atmospheric behaviors. The
demonstrations and the numerical example below will make this clear.
The Sun is obviously the only natural and
external heat source for the planet and atmosphere, however, on the Earth’s
surface there are other heat sources which are constituted by the generation of
heat by certain human activities, such as fossil fuel and nuclear power plants,
industries, vehicles, burnings, etc, which ones add heat and mass to the
atmosphere and consequently affect its heat and mass balances and thus the air
temperature and other atmospheric behaviors.
The equation (2) from Sartori (2015) represents
and explains this heat balance
S + H = qe + qr + qc + qL
where, S = solar radiation received by the Earth’s
surface, W/m2; H = heat generated at or added to the surface by
human activities, W/m2; qe = latent heat loss by evaporation, W/m2; qr = sensible heat loss by
radiation, W/m2; qc =
sensible heat loss by convection, W/m2; qk = sensible heat loss by conduction through the soil, W/m2;
qL = latent heat
loss from the surface due to the steam, W/m2.
This energy added to the Earth’s surface
comes from the energy existent in the subsoil coal, oil, gas, uranium, etc, which
is converted into heat by human activities. This heat is released to the
atmosphere by radiation, convection and latent heat. The consequence is a
warming of portions of the atmosphere. And extra heat generates clouds, rain,
strong winds. And it is known from the study of the physics that latent heat
generates storms. Then, if it generates storms it also generates tornadoes and
hurricanes, as I have always demonstrated physically and mathematically. So,
certain human actions can alter the heat and mass balances of the atmosphere
and as a result alter its humidity, temperature and natural behaviors, directly,
that is, not as has been said to us up to now due to the “greenhouse effect
caused by the CO2”.
To illustrate, let’s see the following
numerical example that considers the latent heat qL and
corresponding mass only. The water consumption by a coal-fired power plant of
600 MW is about 3.5 l/MWh or 35,000 l/min,
or even more, that is, this is the approximate amount of water that such plant
consumes (water lost to the air, not included the water that is “recycled” by
these plants) from rivers and lakes and throws into the atmosphere.
The corresponding latent heat released
can be easily calculated. The mass of water that only one of these plants throws
into the air is obtained as
m =
3.5 l/kWh x 600.000 kW = 2,100,000 l/h = 50,400,000 l/d
A nuclear plant releases 80% more
water than a corresponding fossil fuel power plant.
Now, calculating the latent heat for this case
we obtain qL = mL = 1,318,858,333 W,
that is, only one of such power plant can emit to the atmosphere 2.2 times its
own nominal power solely in latent heat. Moreover, if we concentrate such
emitted energy in one square meter this energy will be equal to 1,318,858,333
W/m2, or 1,884,083 times (!) the solar radiation of 700 W/m2,
which is a high solar energy value, or can heat 1,884,083
m2 with the equivalent energy of 700 W on each square meter.
For those who thought that human beings do not
have the capacity to influence the climate, here are good measures and
clarifying calculations, for the first time in the world.
If so much heat multiplied by so
many heat sources is released into the air on every instant around the world,
obviously that the local and regional air is heated and thermometers in the
vicinities register such increases and then the average temperature and other
atmospheric behaviors are affected.
Such impacts are due to certain
direct human actions and not indirect ones due to some gases. This is clear and very different
than the pseudoscience thinking for which almost only one gas (with a
concentration of 0.039% (!) in the atmosphere) and the corresponding radiation
must be considered alone for deciding about the planet’s air temperature and
everything else about climatic issues. Furthermore, the CO2 has an influence of less than one
percent on the air temperature, as I demonstrated in the above mentioned
scientific papers.
Therefore, all of the factors, variables and
atmospheric components described in the scientific papers mentioned above must
be taken into account for computing the air temperature and climate changes,
including the water vapor and the cloud cover strong influence, which elements
also vary according to the new totals.
Moreover, these are scientific reasons on why
we verify that the graph “hockey stick” (pillar of the pseudoscience) is erroneous
and false and does not represent the atmospheric physical reality and the true
air temperature.
So, these are other demonstrations of mine
through which we can clearly see that the air temperature, its variations and
other atmospheric behaviors cannot be attributed exclusively to the carbon
dioxide, to its radiation, to its greenhouse effect and to the Sun.